top of page

REAL CAMPAIGN RESULTS

Results with the context left in

Two anonymous campaign case studies showing what changed, what Meta reported and where the numbers need qualification.

48%

lower cost per lead

13

leads from the new JPH test

310

Meta-attributed purchases

6.06x

platform-reported ROAS

Results are account- and period-specific. Meta figures are platform-attributed under the reporting settings used at the time.

META ADS FOR LEAD GENERATION

How a property education business cut cost per lead by 48%

Without tearing down the Meta campaign already working.

13 leads

Total leads

A$344.15

Media spend

A$26.47

Media CPL

48%

Lower CPL

From 22–28 July 2026 the new separate A$50/day application-first test generated 13 leads at A$26.47, while the existing prospecting generated 10 leads at A$50.71. It produced three more leads on about 32% less spend.

Key Test Actions

A short honesty note: lead volume does not guarantee applications or sales, and results vary between accounts and over time.

  • • Protect the established winner
    • Run a clean separate test
    • Assess CPL, applications, booked calls and lead quality
    • Move budget using evidence

META ADS FOR ECOMMERCE

From inconsistent paid acquisition to a repeatable sales engine

310

Meta-attributed purchases

A$53,213.73

Tracked purchase value

6.06x

Platform-reported ROAS

A$28.32

Cost per purchase

Campaigns were aligned around purchases, product-led creative was refined, delivery kept moving through an Instagram restriction, inefficient ad sets were switched off and spend was concentrated into stronger campaigns.

Storewide context: complete-month Shopify sales rose from A$25.1K in March to A$40.8K in July, a 63% increase. This is context, not a claim that Meta caused every sale.

JPH_Ecommerce_Sales_Trend.png

From 1 March–12 August 2026 Meta attributed 310 purchases and A$53.2K purchase value to A$8.8K in media spend. Over the same engagement window Shopify recorded A$171,610.20 in total store sales and 1,023 orders.

Optimisation example

From 4–6 August, combined Facebook and Instagram delivery produced five purchases at A$23.38 and 8.93x ROAS. A Facebook-only fallback produced one purchase at A$156.42 and 0.99x ROAS, so the weaker ad set was switched off.

8.93x ROAS

Combined FB/IG Winner

0.99x ROAS

Standalone FB Fallback (Cut)

01

Transparent reporting

Meta results are clearly separated from storewide performance.

Clear reporting. Straight answers. No lock-in contracts.

02

Honest recommendations

You will know what is working, what is not and what should change next.

03

Flexible partnership

Month-to-month engagement with no long lock-in contract.

Want to know what these principles would look like in your account?

We review your current performance, identify qualified opportunities and outline a clearer path forward.

bottom of page